Don't Show Your Christmas in Public?
| by Pastor Andrew Paton |
The Offense of the Christmas Carol |
"Bah, humbug!" can be said in many ways. The line by Scrooge can be
the grumbling cry of the jostled shopper, it can be the cynical murmur of
the bored teenager and it can be the affected superior air of the
atheist.
This year I think I heard it in the frantic warnings of a few
New Jersey school districts.
They have been successful in curbing the use of the word Christmas
in the halls of education. The dreaded Yuletide songs have been expunged
from the choir’s repertoire. This year they have taken aim at a new
threat – the Christmas music itself. One learned representative of our
educational institutions observed that it was wrong to allow school bands
to play the carols because the music has "religious overtones".
They want
to keep the holiday at year’s end without any reference to what the
celebration is all about. Don't be so quick with the shake of your head. There is something
very offensive about the main idea of Christmas.
I understand how someone
would want to keep all thoughts of God from intruding into the world
outside the church buildings.
Christmas is all about a God who loves a
fallen creation so much that when none of His laws could touch their
selfish hearts he left heaven and came and lived here for 33 years. He
came giving and blessing and healing, but He also came demanding:
requiring a heart surrender and a turning away from self-rule.
The God-man was rejected and crucified precisely because He intruded into the
affairs of state, recreation and community life.
James Montgomery penned that famous carol "Come and Worship, come
and worship Christ the new-born King." He took the events of the
Christmas night and wove into them a deeper message. He spoke of
"Shepherds in the fields abiding, watching o’er your flocks by night" and
then startled us with the idea: "God with man is now residing, yonder (a
word you don’t hear any more) shines the infant light."
If it is offensive to merely have the name of Jesus mentioned in
the company of someone who doesn’t accept the most widely held religion
of the USA, I can quite see how immeasurably more one would be offended
if the Founder of that faith walked about believing He was divine and
calling people to repent of self focussed living.
If that word "sinner" makes some people shudder with distaste they
won’t have much pleasure in Montgomery’s final verse: "Sinners, moved by
true repentance, doomed for guilt to endless pains." The poet doesn’t
blush to mention Hell.
The place reserved for the final eternal above for
all who determinedly resist the loving wooing of a Holy Creator is one
we’d rather confine to bad language than serious consideration.
I’d also be offended by such a song – were it not for the fact that in my case the
message is spot on.
I was living as though I was boss of my life. I saw
the world through the prism of self-aggrandizement. I needed to be freed
from the tyranny of selfishness. Each time I took God’s name in vain lied
or coveted another’s possessions I was adding another crime against love.
The record grew dismal. Even if you are much better than I am, and only
sinned once every second day you are still in poor shape after a decade.
My sins – though only paper ropes initially, added to each other
until they became chains that kept me from holiness in thought and
attitude. Today I rejoice at Montgomery’s next lines: "Justice (because
of Calvary) now revokes the sentence; Mercy calls you, breaks your
chains!"
If the main idea behind Christmas is true: if God came here to call
rebellious hearts to bow their knee to His reign, it follows that one
would either think of this season with great rejoicing or with a deep
desire to consign it all to the sphere of "Bah, Humbug!"
Your personal experience with God to date will influence your choice.
|