[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines


Home
THE PHYSICAL Healthy Vitamix
Nutri-Elements
Glycemic Index
Health Tips
THE SPIRITUAL The Skeptic
Commandments
Pastor's Articles
Back to School
M Amendment
Conflict!
Atheist Faith
Heroes
Lincoln & God
Evolution?
Times of Trouble
Honor
Broken Dreams
Supreme Court
Temptation
War
the Bible
McCarthyism
Headstones
Giving Advice
Tsunami!
Rewards
Reagan
4 freedoms
Easter Questions
Euthanasia
Pope
How Life Began
Wiretapping
Disagreement
Former Atheist
Celibacy
Today's Ideas
America & God
faithful heart
Courage
No Evidence?
Love Always
Freedom
Life's Trials
R U Religious?
In God We Trust
Air Force Cadet
Created Equal
Morals
Katrina
Mousetrap
Fame
How I Do Prayer
The Sacrifice
Recognize Jesus
Invention
Worried?
With God
A Pure Mind
CHRISTmas
Diminishing Returns
Do Right
Speak of Jesus
Idiot?
Sartre
Bible Truth
Last Words
Tax-exempt
Music to God
Citizenship
The Constitution
Grad's Speech
Theory
Your Rights
Big Government
The Letter
Where is God?
Washington DC
SITE INFO About
Contact
$ Moneymaker $
Healthy Meals
Digestive
Go Natural!


Why A Low Glycemic Diet

"Beats Out "

The Low Fat Diet



Bad News for Rice Cakes


A low glycemic diet, rich in the type of carbohydrates that maintain a more stable blood sugar beats out a conventional low fat diet in reducing the risk factors for heart disease and diabetes, according to a new study.

Researchers compared a diet rich in carbohydrates with a low glycemic index -- the type that stabilizes blood sugar -- with a conventional low fat diet that included carbohydrates with a high glycemic index.

How to Get a FREE "Guide to the Glycemic Diet"



"Carbohydrates with a low glycemic index are absorbed through the small intestine and converted to blood sugar at a much slower rate than high glycemic, resulting in a more stable blood sugar and much less insulin being produced," said Mark A. Pereira, a University of Minnesota epidemiologist. "So that would help prevent or control diabetes."

The work by Pereira and his team appears in the Nov. 24 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

In the study, those on the low glycemic diets also achieved better improvement in blood pressure and blood fats, and their resting metabolic rate -- the rate at which the body burns energy or calories at rest -- didn't drop as much as it did for those on the low fat diet.

Low glycemic menus within the studies normally allowed more fat -- about 30 percent -- than the low fat, which allowed 18 percent fat

Pereira and his colleagues assigned 39 overweight or obese young adults, ages 18 to 40, to either the low glycemic diet or the low fat diet. The low glycemic diet got 43 percent of calories from carbohydrates, 27 percent from protein, and 30 percent from fat, Pereira said.

(For the sake of comparison, the popular Zone Diet consists of 40 percent of calories from carbohydrates, 30 percent from protein, and 30 percent from fat. Low glycemic carbohydrates are recommended.)

Those on the low fat diet got 65 percent of their calories from carbohydrates, 17 percent from protein, and 18 percent from fat. Both diets were restricted in calories to achieve a 10 percent weight loss.

Food was provided for the subjects. The low glycemic menus featured such foods as steel-cut oatmeal, barley and whole-grain breads. The menus for the low fat diet included carbohydrate foods with a higher glycemic index, such as instant oatmeal, white bread and white rice.

A decrease in blood fats and blood pressure and insulin resistance twice as great for the low glycemic group over the low fat group

Pereira's team measured blood pressure, insulin resistance (a predictor of diabetes), blood fats and other risk factors for diabetes and heart disease, before and after the weight loss. "Generally, what we found across the board for blood fats and blood pressure and insulin resistance is, the decrease with weight loss was twice as great for the low glycemic group compared to the low fat group."

Both groups averaged the same amount of weight loss, the 10 percent goal, but the dieters on the low glycemic diet reported less hunger. And their resting metabolic rate, which typically drops during weight loss, dropped less in the low glycemic eaters.

"For the conventional low fat dieters, the metabolic rate slowed down by 175 calories a day," Pereira said. "For the low glycemic group, there was a 95-calorie drop."

The new study echoes those of previous studies, Pereira added.

Help for those on a low glycemic diet


VITAMIX

Easy to Eat Fruits & Veggies


A juicer, processor, mixer, grain grinder, hot soup maker, and blender and then.....

IT CLEANS ITSELF!


Whole Food Living

Raw Kitchens
Need VitaMix



Green Smoothies
Filled With
Healthy Elements


Fitness and our
Performance Smoothies!


Healthy Baby


Gluten Free Made Easy


New Research
on Blending